1990 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.3 E (132 Hp) 1990Overall Score61.25/100
1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Ford Tempo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (102 Hp) 1990Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationFord Tempo
AudiMakeFord
80ModelTempo
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationFord Tempo
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2307 cc
132 HPPower102 HP
190 NmTorque176 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationFord Tempo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationFord Tempo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationFord Tempo
4478 mmLength4490 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1397 mmHeight1340 mm
1290 KgWeight1180 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…