DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XK 8 vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

87.5–87.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XK 8ModelMustang
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4606 cc
298 HPPower304 HP
411 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank61 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption17 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption13,6 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption15,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
245/50 R17Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength4765 mm
1829 mmWidth1875 mm
1306 mmHeight1385 mm
1775 KgWeight1565 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XK 8 and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…