DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Jaguar XK 8 vs 2001 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XK 8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLand Rover
XK 8ModelRange Rover
2001Model year2001
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
250 km/hTop speed208 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement4398 cc
284 HPPower286 HP
375 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption22,2 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption12,6 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption16,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/50 R17Tyre size255/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength4950 mm
1829 mmWidth1955 mm
1306 mmHeight1860 mm
1780 KgWeight2510 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Jaguar XK 8 and 2001 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XK 8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…