DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jaguar XK 8 vs 2000 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XK 8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XK 8SpecificationBMW X5
JaguarMakeBMW
XK 8ModelX5
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XK 8SpecificationBMW X5
6,7 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement4398 cc
284 HPPower286 HP
375 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XK 8SpecificationBMW X5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank92 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption18,8 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption13,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XK 8SpecificationBMW X5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R18; 255/50 R19; 285/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XK 8SpecificationBMW X5
4760 mmLength4666 mm
1829 mmWidth1872 mm
1306 mmHeight1717 mm
1780 KgWeight2085 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jaguar XK 8 and 2000 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XK 8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…