DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jaguar XK 8 vs 1996 Jaguar XK 8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XK 8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.5–83.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJaguar
XK 8ModelXK 8
2000Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

6,7 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement3998 cc
284 HPPower284 HP
375 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/50 R17Tyre size245/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength4760 mm
1829 mmWidth1829 mm
1306 mmHeight1306 mm
1780 KgWeight1780 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2588 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jaguar XK 8 and 1996 Jaguar XK 8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XK 8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…