DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Jaguar XJS vs 2000 Dodge Durango Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Durango

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeDodge
XJSModelDurango
1996Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats8
2Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
260 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5993 ccEngine displacement5895 cc
302 HPPower250 HP
471 NmTorque454 Nm
12Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
89 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption23,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption16,6 lt
14,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/55 ZR16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4820 mmLength4910 mm
1793 mmWidth1810 mm
1254 mmHeight1804 mm
1860 KgWeight2190 Kg
2588 mmWheelbase2944 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Jaguar XJS and 2000 Dodge Durango approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Durango leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…