DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 80 vs 1982 Pontiac 6000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac 6000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
AudiMakePontiac
80Model6000
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
136 HPPower106 HP
176 NmTorque183 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
195/60 R14Tyre size195/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationPontiac 6000
4383 mmLength4795 mm
1682 mmWidth1830 mm
1365 mmHeight1365 mm
1190 KgWeight1275 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 80 and 1982 Pontiac 6000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac 6000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…