1982 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.2 (136 Hp) 1982Overall Score61.25/100
1982 Audi 80 vs 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1982 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.5 i (106 Hp) 1982Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
AudiMakeOldsmobile
80ModelCutlass
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
136 HPPower106 HP
176 NmTorque183 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
10 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
195/60 R14Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4383 mmLength4835 mm
1682 mmWidth1765 mm
1365 mmHeight1375 mm
1190 KgWeight1275 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2665 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1982 Audi 80 and 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…