1983 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.1 (115 Hp) 1983Overall Score67.25/100
1983 Audi 80 vs 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Oldsmobile
Cutlass
Oldsmobile Cutlass 2.3 16 (162 Hp) 1987Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Oldsmobile Cutlass
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.25–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
AudiMakeOldsmobile
80ModelCutlass
1983Model year1987
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2144 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
115 HPPower162 HP
165 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
175/70 R13Tyre size195/75 R14 S
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationOldsmobile Cutlass
4383 mmLength4900 mm
1682 mmWidth1805 mm
1365 mmHeight1350 mm
—Weight1445 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1983 Audi 80 and 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…