DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJR vs 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLand Rover
XJRModelRange Rover
2004Model year2008
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
250 km/hTop speed225 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
395 HPPower390 HP
541 NmTorque550 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank105 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption22,4 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption12,2 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/40 R19Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5024 mmLength4950 mm
1799 mmWidth1955 mm
1314 mmHeight1860 mm
1728 KgWeight2560 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJR and 2008 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…