DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJR vs 2004 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XJRModelMustang
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

5,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed280 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
395 HPPower390 HP
541 NmTorque529 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank59 lt
17,9 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/40 R19Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5024 mmLength4661 mm
1799 mmWidth1857 mm
1314 mmHeight1344 mm
1728 KgWeight1745 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJR and 2004 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…