DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar XJR vs 2006 Buick Rainer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Rainer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.25–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeBuick
XJRModelRainer
2003Model year2006
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

5,4 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
254 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
363 HPPower295 HP
0 NmTorque375 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank83 lt
18,5 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/40 R18Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5024 mmLength4871 mm
1799 mmWidth1894 mm
1314 mmHeight1894 mm
1775 KgWeight2065 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2869 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar XJR and 2006 Buick Rainer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Rainer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…