DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJ vs 2006 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

87.5–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeLand Rover
XJModelRange Rover
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
250 km/hTop speed208 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4394 cc
298 HPPower299 HP
411 NmTorque425 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank105 lt
16 ltUrban consumption21,2 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5215 mmLength4950 mm
1860 mmWidth1955 mm
1448 mmHeight1860 mm
1640 KgWeight2485 Kg
3159 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJ and 2006 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…