DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJ vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

87.5–87.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XJModelMustang
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4606 cc
300 HPPower304 HP
411 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank61 lt
16 ltUrban consumption17 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption13,6 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption15,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/50 R18Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5090 mmLength4765 mm
1860 mmWidth1875 mm
1448 mmHeight1385 mm
1615 KgWeight1565 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJ and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…