1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 E 16V (137 Hp) 1992Overall Score63.5/100
1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Toyota Chaser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Toyota
Chaser
Toyota Chaser 2.0i (170 Hp) 1992Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Chaser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Chaser
AudiMakeToyota
80ModelChaser
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Chaser
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
137 HPPower170 HP
181 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Chaser
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Chaser
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Chaser
4482 mmLength4690 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1375 mm
1270 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase2680 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Toyota Chaser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Chaser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…