DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
80ModelColt
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
208 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
137 HPPower160 HP
181 NmTorque221 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption10 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4403 mmLength3950 mm
1695 mmWidth1670 mm
1371 mmHeight1380 mm
1170 KgWeight1010 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…