DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Jaguar XJ vs 2002 Jaguar XK 8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XK 8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJaguar
XJModelXK 8
1999Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

5,6 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
363 HPPower363 HP
505 NmTorque505 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank75 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
12,6 ltAverage consumption12,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/40 R18Tyre size245/45 R18; 255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength4760 mm
1799 mmWidth1829 mm
1345 mmHeight1306 mm
1845 KgWeight1825 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2588 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Jaguar XJ and 2002 Jaguar XK 8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XK 8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…