DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Jaguar XJ vs 2002 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeChrysler
XJModelConcorde
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
284 HPPower258 HP
375 NmTorque348 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank65 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
12 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength5310 mm
1799 mmWidth1890 mm
1345 mmHeight1435 mm
1780 KgWeight1690 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Jaguar XJ and 2002 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…