DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Toyota Cresta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Cresta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
80ModelCresta
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h—
186 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
115 HPPower135 HP
165 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4750 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1408 mmHeight1390 mm
1270 KgWeight1280 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Toyota Cresta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Cresta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…