DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
AudiMakeOpel
80ModelOmega
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
11,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower100 HP
166 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
4482 mmLength4740 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1406 mmHeight1445 mm
1230 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…