1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 E (115 Hp) 1994Overall Score58.25/100
1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (145 Hp) 1994Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelBluebird
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
11,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower145 HP
166 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4482 mmLength4585 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1406 mmHeight1405 mm
1230 KgWeight1230 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…