DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Toyota Chaser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Chaser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeToyota
80ModelChaser
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower135 HP
166 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4690 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1406 mmHeight1375 mm
1230 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Toyota Chaser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Chaser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…