DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Capella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMazda
80ModelCapella
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
115 HPPower140 HP
166 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4590 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1406 mmHeight1430 mm
1230 KgWeight1240 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Capella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…