DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escort

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
AudiMakeFord
80ModelEscort
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
11,8 s0–100 km/h8,60 s
190 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower147 HP
166 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/50 VR15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Escort
4482 mmLength4040 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1406 mmHeight1340 mm
1230 KgWeight1096 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…