DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2012 Toyota RAV4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeToyota
XJModelRAV4
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
275 HPPower269 HP
0 NmTorque333 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5 ECT
—Tyre size225/65 R17; 235/55 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4620 mm
—Width1816-1854 mm
—Height1684-1745 mm
—Weight1665-1678 Kg
—Wheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2012 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…