DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2012 Toyota Harrier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeToyota
XJModelHarrier
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
250 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
275 HPPower280 HP
0 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
—Tyre size225/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4730 mm
—Width1845 mm
—Height1680 mm
—Weight1835 Kg
—Wheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2012 Toyota Harrier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…