DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2012 Toyota Camry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeToyota
XJModelCamry
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
275 HPPower275 HP
0 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4825 mm
—Width1825 mm
—Height1480 mm
—Weight1615 Kg
—Wheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2012 Toyota Camry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…