DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2012 Lexus RX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus RX
JaguarMakeLexus
XJModelRX
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus RX
6,4 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
250 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
275 HPPower277 HP
0 NmTorque346 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus RX
DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank72 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus RX
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears—
—Tyre size235/55 R19
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationLexus RX
—Length4740 mm
—Width1885 mm
—Height1725 mm
—Weight2050 Kg
—Wheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2012 Lexus RX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…