DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Audi 80 vs 1984 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.25–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationAudi 200
AudiMakeAudi
80Model200
1984Model year1984
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2/4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationAudi 200
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
184 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2144 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
165 NmTorque180 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationAudi 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationAudi 200
4383 mmLength4807 mm
1682 mmWidth1814 mm
1365 mmHeight1422 mm
1030 KgWeight1260 Kg
2541 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Audi 80 and 1984 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…