DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jaguar XJ vs 2008 Alfa Romeo 159 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlfa Romeo
XJModel159
2009Model year2008
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3195 cc
275 HPPower260 HP
0 NmTorque322 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption15,9 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4660 mm
—Width1828 mm
—Height1417 mm
—Weight1740 Kg
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jaguar XJ and 2008 Alfa Romeo 159 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…