DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jaguar XJ vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
JaguarMakeSaab
XJModel9-3
2009Model year2008
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
6,4 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
250 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
275 HPPower250 HP
0 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationSaab 9-3
—Length4635 mm
—Width1762 mm
—Height1434 mm
—Wheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jaguar XJ and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…