DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XJ vs 2017 Alpina D4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D4
JaguarMakeAlpina
XJModelD4
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D4
6,2 s0–100 km/h5,0 s
250 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
300 HPPower350 HP
700 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D4
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size245/35 ZR19; 265/35 ZR19
NoABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D4
4691 mmLength4640 mm
1939 mmWidth1825 mm
1468 mmHeight1382 mm
1770 kgWeight1815 Kg
540 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XJ and 2017 Alpina D4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…