1995 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.25/100
1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Toyota Caldina Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Toyota
Caldina
Toyota Caldina 2.0 D (73 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Toyota Caldina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Caldina
AudiMakeToyota
80ModelCaldina
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Caldina
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower73 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Caldina
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Caldina
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationToyota Caldina
4482 mmLength4545 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1408 mmHeight1450 mm
1230 KgWeight1220 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2580 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Toyota Caldina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Caldina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…