1995 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.25/100
1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Nissan Bluebird Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0D (76 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelBluebird
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower76 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationNissan Bluebird
4482 mmLength4585 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1408 mmHeight1405 mm
1230 KgWeight1230 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…