DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelAD
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower76 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
4482 mmLength4175 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1408 mmHeight1480 mm
1230 KgWeight1070 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…