DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolkswagen
XJModelScirocco
2012Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
241 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower211 HP
340 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—TransmissionDSG
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5127 mmLength4256 mm
1899 mmWidth1810 mm
1456 mmHeight1404 mm
1660 KgWeight1393 kg
—Luggage capacity292 lt
3032 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Jaguar XJ

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…