DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Audi 80 vs 1993 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 400

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
AudiMakeRover
80Model400
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
13,6 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
148 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 400
4482 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1406 mmHeight—
1190 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Audi 80 and 1993 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…