DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1993 Audi 80 vs 1993 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeNissan
80ModelBluebird
1993Model year1993
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower76 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4482 mmLength4585 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1406 mmHeight1405 mm
1190 KgWeight1230 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1993 Audi 80 and 1993 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…