1992 • Audi
80
Audi 80 2.0 (90 Hp) 1992Overall Score51.25/100
1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Nissan King Cab Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Nissan
King Cab
Nissan King Cab 2.3 D (75 Hp) 1992Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Nissan King Cab
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationNissan King Cab
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelKing Cab
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationNissan King Cab
13,6 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2283 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
148 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationNissan King Cab
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationNissan King Cab
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationNissan King Cab
4482 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1406 mmHeight—
1190 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Nissan King Cab approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan King Cab leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…