E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
80ModelAD
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
13,6 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower76 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationNissan AD
4482 mmLength4175 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1406 mmHeight1480 mm
1190 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1992 Peugeot 505VS1992 Audi 80Peugeot 505 vs Audi 801992 and 1992 model yearsImage unavailableVS1992 Audi 80Nissan AD vs Audi 801992 and 1992 model years1992 Nissan BluebirdVS1992 Audi 80Nissan Bluebird vs Audi 801992 and 1992 model years1992 Toyota CaldinaVS1992 Audi 80Toyota Caldina vs Audi 801992 and 1992 model years1992 Toyota CoronaVS1992 Audi 80Toyota Corona vs Audi 801992 and 1992 model years

Comments are loading…