DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Acura TL vs 1996 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura TLSpecificationVolvo 940
AcuraMakeVolvo
TLModel940
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura TLSpecificationVolvo 940
—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
176 HPPower165 HP
0 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura TLSpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura TLSpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15 V
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Acura TLSpecificationVolvo 940
4864 mmLength4871 mm
1786 mmWidth1750 mm
1405 mmHeight1411 mm
—Weight1440 Kg
2840 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Acura TL and 1996 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…