2010 • Jaguar
XF
Jaguar XF 5.0 V8 (385 Hp) 2010Overall Score90.5/100
2010 Jaguar XF vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R (390 Hp) 2005Overall Score91.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jaguar XFSpecificationFord Mustang
JaguarMakeFord
XFModelMustang
2010Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Jaguar XFSpecificationFord Mustang
5,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed280 km/h
5000 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
385 HPPower390 HP
515 NmTorque529 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Jaguar XFSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank59 lt
17,3 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jaguar XFSpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/45R18Tyre size245/40 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jaguar XFSpecificationFord Mustang
4961 mmLength4661 mm
1877 mmWidth1857 mm
1460 mmHeight1344 mm
1780 KgWeight1745 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Jaguar XF and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…