E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Audi 80 vs 1987 Volvo 240 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 240

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 240
AudiMakeVolvo
80Model240
1991Model year1987
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 240
13,6 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2382 cc
90 HPPower79 HP
148 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 240
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 240
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationVolvo 240
4482 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1406 mmHeight—
1190 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Audi 80 and 1987 Volvo 240 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 240 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1991 Peugeot 505VS1991 Audi 80Peugeot 505 vs Audi 801991 and 1991 model yearsImage unavailableVS1991 Audi 80Nissan AD vs Audi 801991 and 1991 model years1991 Nissan BluebirdVS1991 Audi 80Nissan Bluebird vs Audi 801991 and 1991 model years1991 Mazda BongoVS1991 Audi 80Mazda Bongo vs Audi 801991 and 1991 model years1991 Ford SierraVS1991 Audi 80Ford Sierra vs Audi 801991 and 1991 model years

Comments are loading…