DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jaguar XF vs 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Grand Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeJeep
XFModelGrand Cherokee
2011Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
237 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
238 HPPower241 HP
293 NmTorque550 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
69 ltFuel tank93 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/50R17Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4822 mm
1877 mmWidth1943 mm
1460 mmHeight1781 mm
1679 KgWeight2272 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2915 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jaguar XF and 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Grand Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…