DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jaguar XF vs 2011 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
JaguarMakeAlpina
XFModelB3
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
8,3 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
237 km/hTop speed244 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
238 HPPower214 HP
293 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank63 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50R17Tyre size245/40 R18ZR
YesABS—

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
4961 mmLength4580 mm
1877 mmWidth1782 mm
1460 mmHeight1395 mm
1679 KgWeight—
2909 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jaguar XF and 2011 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…