DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeMitsubishi
XFModelPajero
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
237 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3200 cc
238 HPPower197 HP
0 NmTorque441 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank69 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4385 mm
1877 mmWidth1875 mm
1460 mmHeight1870 mm
1690 KgWeight2095 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2012 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…