DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2012 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XFModelRanger
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
237 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3198 cc
238 HPPower200 HP
0 NmTorque470 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength5359 mm
1877 mmWidth1850 mm
1460 mmHeight1815 mm
1690 KgWeight2073 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2012 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…