DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jaguar XF vs 2009 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo S60
JaguarMakeVolvo
XFModelS60
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo S60
8,2 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
229 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2401 cc
207 HPPower260 HP
435 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo S60
DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo S60
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50R17Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationVolvo S60
4961 mmLength4576 mm
1877 mmWidth1804 mm
1460 mmHeight1428 mm
1771 KgWeight1520 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jaguar XF and 2009 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…