DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Jaguar XF vs 2008 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
JaguarMakeMazda
XFModel3
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
8,2 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
229 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
207 HPPower260 HP
435 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50R17Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
4961 mmLength4435 mm
1877 mmWidth1765 mm
1460 mmHeight1465 mm
1771 KgWeight1410 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Jaguar XF and 2008 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…