DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolkswagen
XFModelScirocco
2012Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
225 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
190 HPPower211 HP
450 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—TransmissionDSG
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4256 mm
1939 mmWidth1810 mm
1468 mmHeight1404 mm
—Weight1393 kg
—Luggage capacity292 lt
2909 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Jaguar XF

No additional feature records are available.

Volkswagen SciroccoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistAuto HoldTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelCooled GloveboxDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsReversing Camera

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2014 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…